Deal FlowMarket Update

Article 6.4 First Issuance: The 40% Volume Haircut Redefining Carbon Pricing

The first UN-approved Paris Agreement credits reveal a massive supply shock as stricter baselines slash project yields.

3 min readBy VCM.fyi

On February 26, 2026, the global carbon market underwent its most significant structural repricing since the collapse of the Kyoto Protocol. The United Nations formally approved the first carbon credits under the Paris Agreement Crediting Mechanism (Article 6.4), issuing 25,515 tonnes of CO₂ equivalent to a clean-cooking project in Myanmar.

While the volume is negligible—barely a rounding error compared to the 740 credits retired yesterday by Kao Corporation Shanghai on our platform—the signal is deafening. This issuance marks the end of the "CDM era" and the beginning of a high-friction, high-integrity regime where credit yields are drastically compressed.

For traders and developers, the headline is not the issuance itself, but the math behind it: a 40% reduction in credited volumes compared to historical methodologies. This is a fundamental reset of project economics that will reverberate through every discounted cash flow (DCF) model in the voluntary carbon market (VCM).

The Deal: A Sovereign-Scale Pilot

The Asset: A clean-cooking project distributing efficient stoves in Myanmar, originally provisioned under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). The Volume: 25,515 Article 6.4 Emission Reductions (A6.4ERs). The Counterparties: The project developer (operating in Myanmar) and the Republic of Korea (Authorized Participant). The Structure: A portion of credits is authorized for transfer to Korea for use in its Emissions Trading System (K-ETS) to meet Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), with the remainder retained by Myanmar.

The Valuation Shock: The 40% Haircut

As we covered in our November analysis of the Paris Agreement Carbon Market Going Live, the transition from Article 6.2 (bilateral) to 6.4 (centralized) was expected to be bumpy. However, the reality of the Article 6.4 Supervisory Body’s methodology is stricter than most developers anticipated.

By applying updated values and conservative baselines, the UN mechanism issued approximately 40% fewer credits than the older CDM system would have approved for the exact same activity.

Why this matters: This is a yield shock. If a developer built a financial model assuming 100,000 tonnes of issuance at $12/tonne (generating $1.2M revenue), and the new Article 6.4 standard only issues 60,000 tonnes, revenue collapses to $720,000. To maintain the same internal rate of return (IRR), the price per credit must rise from $12 to $20.

This establishes a new "integrity floor" for pricing. Compliance buyers like South Korea or Japan’s incoming GX-ETS—which we noted could drive 50-60 million tonnes of demand—cannot procure cheap, inflated credits. They are structurally forced to buy scarcer, more expensive units.

The Pipeline Risk: 165 Projects in Limbo

The Myanmar issuance is the first of a pipeline of 165 host-Party-approved projects attempting to transition from the CDM to Article 6.4. These projects span waste management, energy, and agriculture.

If the 40% haircut applied to the Myanmar project is indicative of the broader transition standard—and Supervisory Body Chair Mkhuthazi Steleki’s comments on "careful application of rules" suggest it is—we are looking at a massive write-down of expected global supply. Millions of "paper tonnes" currently in project pipelines may vaporize upon validation.

This supply compression arrives precisely as demand creates a pincer movement. On one side, sovereign buyers need credits for NDCs. On the other, corporate buyers are aggressively locking in supply.

The Corporate Response: Microsoft’s Pre-emptive Strike

Sophisticated corporate buyers aren't waiting for the Article 6.4 dust to settle. They are front-running the supply crunch.

In a move that perfectly illustrates the "flight to quality," Microsoft announced massive new purchases in early February 2026, totaling five million tonnes. This includes:

  • 2.85 million tonnes of soil carbon credits from Indigo Ag over 12 years.
  • 2 million tonnes of Afforestation/Reforestation (ARR) credits via Rubicon Carbon.
  • 100,000+ tonnes of biochar from Varaha.

Microsoft’s Director of Carbon Removal, Phillip Goodman, explicitly cited "advanced modeling" and "third-party standards" as drivers—language that mirrors the UN’s new rigor. By securing 2.85 million tonnes from Indigo Ag now, Microsoft insulates itself from the price spikes that will inevitably occur as Article 6.4 standards filter down to the voluntary market (ICVCM) and squeeze supply.

Strategic Implications

For Project Developers: The era of aggressive additionality is over. You must stress-test your existing pipeline against a 30-50% reduction in issuance volumes. Projects operating on thin margins under CDM assumptions are now distressed assets. Conversely, projects with robust data that can survive this haircut will command a significant "Article 6 Premium."

For Traders & Portfolio Managers: Expect a bifurcation.

  1. Legacy/Low-Quality: Vintages pre-2022 and methodologies with "CDM DNA" will trade at widening discounts.
  2. Paris-Aligned: Credits that meet Article 6.4 rigor (or ICVCM CCPs) will see price appreciation driven by scarcity. The "40% haircut" acts as a supply cap, supporting a bullish long-term view on high-integrity assets.

For Corporate Buyers: The "wait and see" strategy is now a liability. With Korea, Japan, and potentially the UK (via SAF mandates) entering the market for high-quality credits, you are no longer competing just with other corporations; you are competing with G7 nations. Microsoft’s 12-year offtake with Indigo Ag is the template: lock in long-term supply now, or face spot market volatility later.

What to Watch

  • The "Haircut" Consistency: Will the next batch of the 165 transition projects also face a ~40% issuance reduction? If this becomes the standard deviation, global supply forecasts for 2027-2030 need to be slashed.
  • Japan’s GX-ETS Entry: Japan allows up to 10% international credits. If they align their eligibility strictly with Article 6.4, expect a bidding war for the limited "golden" credits issuing from projects like the Myanmar cookstoves.
  • VCM Methodology Updates: Watch for Verra and Gold Standard to potentially tighten their own methodologies to align with the UN’s precedent. If the voluntary market adopts the "conservative baseline" approach, issuance volumes across the board will contract.
  • Indigo Ag's Delivery: With Microsoft contracting 2.85M tonnes, Indigo Ag must deliver. Any delivery shortfall here would exacerbate the scarcity narrative and drive prices higher for remaining high-durability supply.

Get carbon market intelligence weekly

Join 8,400+ professionals getting AI-powered carbon market insights every Friday.